Jesus Christ(C 6/4 BCE-C30CE), also called Jesus sin of Joseph,Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus of Galilee or simply Christ, was a Jewish religious leader who became a central figure in Christianity, regarded by most Christian branches as God himself. The life of Jesus began in The north and central Palestine, a region between The dead sea and The Jordan river in The east and The eastern Mediterranean in The west. This region was under Roman control since The 1st century BCE,initially as a tributary kingdom. The Roman campaigns, coupled with internal revolts and The incursion of The parthians,made the region very unstable and chaotic up until 37BCE, when Herod The great became king. The term "historical jesus" refers to attempts to reconstruct The life and teachings I Jesus of Nazareth by critical historical methods, in contrast to christologicak definitions and other Christian accounts of Jesus. It also considers The historical and cultural context in which Jesus lived. The historicity of jesus deals with whether or not Jesus existed. The issue of the historicity of jesus Christ has zealously kept busy a great part of humanity from the 1st century c.e until today. The understanding of the historicity of jesus and the historical jesus would first involve an in depth study of the words "historicity" and "historical". The word "historical" could refer to the background of something or someone connected to the past. The historical jesus is a form of search of the background of jesus and history through historical methods of the life and teachings ig Jesus. Since the 18th century, there have been many scholarly quests for the historical jesus. These researches led to the development ig different potraits by scholars based on the historical data that they got.by the 21at century, scholars started to question the historical findings concerning Jesus especially with the conflicting minimalist and maximalist approaches of the 19th and 20th century.
Virtually all scholars who write on the subject agree that Jesus existed, although scholars differ about the beliefs and teachings of Jesus as well as the accuracy of the biblical accounts and the only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by the order of the Roman perfect Pontius Pilate. The historicity of jesus concerns the degree to which sources show Jesus of Nazareth existed as a historical figure. It concerns the issue of "what really happened", based upon the context of the time and place and also the issue of how modern observers can come to know what really happened. The historicity of jesus is distinct from the related study of the historical jesus, which refers to scholarly reconstructions of the life of jesus based primarily in critical analysis of the gospel texts.if the bible is a reliavke historical document, then we cannot deny that a man named Jesus actually lived and taught at thatbpiint in history. Indeed, Christ is treated as a historicak figure by early secular historians as well. Around A.D 93, the Jewish historian Josephus refers to Jesus at least twice in his "antiquities of the jews". There is not physical or archeological evident for Jesus. All sources are documentary, mainly Christian writings, such as the gospels and the ourpoted letters ti the apostles. In conclusion, the historical background to the new testament is still relevant today because of the historical jesus and the historicity of Jesus. This is because the entire new testaament revolves around him as a character and a figure in history. His lack of existence or historical background would make the new testament a mere fable and this, not worthy of scholarly attention. The historical jesus and the historicity of Jesus are not the same. However, the historical jesus and an understanding of the historical background of jesus, proves the historicity of Jesus.
Most contemporary scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed and most biblical scholars and classical historians see the theories of his nonexistence as effectively refuted. There is no indication that writers in antiquity who opposed Christianity questioned the existence of Jesus. However, there is a widespread disagreement among scholars on the details of the life of Jesus mentioned in the gospel narratives and Im the meaning of his teachings. It is important to note that Jesus in his lifetime was not an important figure at all. He was only only Jewish preacher in a minor province of the vast Roman empire. He had no political power and were IT not for the people later called Christians who followed him, he would have remained unknown but nevertheless, there are evidences that point to the fact that Jesus existed.
Another line of evidence establishing the historicity of jesus is the fact that the earliest enemies of the Christian faith did not deny that Christ actually lived. The impact of the Christian movement Is powerful testimony to the reality of its founder. It Is inconceivable that a non-existent figure could have generated a societal force as world shaking as Christianity. There is no logical way to explain how the Christian system started and grew so rapidly except for the fact that adherents knew of Jesus' life, death and resurrection. Several lines of evidence converge to establish the historical reality of jesus: the new testament documents, ancient Jewish sources, Roman writings, early antagonists of Christianity, the testimony of the patrisic writers, the act of the Roman catacombs, the impact of Christianity in history.
Jesus Christ(C 6/4 BCE-C30CE), also called Jesus sin of Joseph,Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus of Galilee or simply Christ, was a Jewish religious leader who became a central figure in Christianity, regarded by most Christian branches as God himself. The life of Jesus began in The north and central Palestine, a region between The dead sea and The Jordan river in The east and The eastern Mediterranean in The west. This region was under Roman control since The 1st century BCE,initially as a tributary kingdom. The Roman campaigns, coupled with internal revolts and The incursion of The parthians,made the region very unstable and chaotic up until 37BCE, when Herod The great became king.
ReplyDeleteThe term "historical jesus" refers to attempts to reconstruct The life and teachings I Jesus of Nazareth by critical historical methods, in contrast to christologicak definitions and other Christian accounts of Jesus. It also considers The historical and cultural context in which Jesus lived.
The historicity of jesus deals with whether or not Jesus existed. The issue of the historicity of jesus Christ has zealously kept busy a great part of humanity from the 1st century c.e until today. The understanding of the historicity of jesus and the historical jesus would first involve an in depth study of the words "historicity" and "historical". The word "historical" could refer to the background of something or someone connected to the past. The historical jesus is a form of search of the background of jesus and history through historical methods of the life and teachings ig Jesus. Since the 18th century, there have been many scholarly quests for the historical jesus. These researches led to the development ig different potraits by scholars based on the historical data that they got.by the 21at century, scholars started to question the historical findings concerning Jesus especially with the conflicting minimalist and maximalist approaches of the 19th and 20th century.
*Jesus son of Joseph* made a mistake ma
DeleteVirtually all scholars who write on the subject agree that Jesus existed, although scholars differ about the beliefs and teachings of Jesus as well as the accuracy of the biblical accounts and the only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by the order of the Roman perfect Pontius Pilate. The historicity of jesus concerns the degree to which sources show Jesus of Nazareth existed as a historical figure. It concerns the issue of "what really happened", based upon the context of the time and place and also the issue of how modern observers can come to know what really happened. The historicity of jesus is distinct from the related study of the historical jesus, which refers to scholarly reconstructions of the life of jesus based primarily in critical analysis of the gospel texts.if the bible is a reliavke historical document, then we cannot deny that a man named Jesus actually lived and taught at thatbpiint in history. Indeed, Christ is treated as a historicak figure by early secular historians as well. Around A.D 93, the Jewish historian Josephus refers to Jesus at least twice in his "antiquities of the jews".
ReplyDeleteThere is not physical or archeological evident for Jesus. All sources are documentary, mainly Christian writings, such as the gospels and the ourpoted letters ti the apostles.
In conclusion, the historical background to the new testament is still relevant today because of the historical jesus and the historicity of Jesus. This is because the entire new testaament revolves around him as a character and a figure in history. His lack of existence or historical background would make the new testament a mere fable and this, not worthy of scholarly attention. The historical jesus and the historicity of Jesus are not the same. However, the historical jesus and an understanding of the historical background of jesus, proves the historicity of Jesus.
Most contemporary scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed and most biblical scholars and classical historians see the theories of his nonexistence as effectively refuted. There is no indication that writers in antiquity who opposed Christianity questioned the existence of Jesus. However, there is a widespread disagreement among scholars on the details of the life of Jesus mentioned in the gospel narratives and Im the meaning of his teachings. It is important to note that Jesus in his lifetime was not an important figure at all. He was only only Jewish preacher in a minor province of the vast Roman empire. He had no political power and were IT not for the people later called Christians who followed him, he would have remained unknown but nevertheless, there are evidences that point to the fact that Jesus existed.
ReplyDeleteAnother line of evidence establishing the historicity of jesus is the fact that the earliest enemies of the Christian faith did not deny that Christ actually lived. The impact of the Christian movement Is powerful testimony to the reality of its founder. It Is inconceivable that a non-existent figure could have generated a societal force as world shaking as Christianity. There is no logical way to explain how the Christian system started and grew so rapidly except for the fact that adherents knew of Jesus' life, death and resurrection. Several lines of evidence converge to establish the historical reality of jesus: the new testament documents, ancient Jewish sources, Roman writings, early antagonists of Christianity, the testimony of the patrisic writers, the act of the Roman catacombs, the impact of Christianity in history.
ReplyDeleteGood. Post your references here.
ReplyDeleteThank you.